From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965487AbbJ1KJx (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:09:53 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com ([209.85.217.179]:34226 "EHLO mail-lb0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755544AbbJ1KJw (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:09:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:09:51 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Michal Marek Cc: Johan Hovold , Julia Lawall , Gilles Muller , Nicolas Palix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr Subject: Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: misc: remove "complex return code" warnings Message-ID: <20151028100951.GG28572@localhost> References: <1443652647-23097-1-git-send-email-johan@kernel.org> <20151028095414.GD28572@localhost> <56309DC8.5030202@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56309DC8.5030202@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:04:56AM +0100, Michal Marek wrote: > Dne 28.10.2015 v 10:54 Johan Hovold napsal(a): > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 06:25:39PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > >> Should have acked this message... > >> > >> Acked-by: Julia Lawall > >> > >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, Johan Hovold wrote: > >> > >>> This effectively reverts 932058a5d5f9 ("coccinelle: misc: semantic patch > >>> to delete overly complex return code processing"). > >>> > >>> There can be both symmetry and readability reasons for not wanting to do > >>> the final function call as part of the return statement and to maintain > >>> a clear separation of success and error paths. > >>> > >>> Since this is in no way mandated by the coding standard, let's just > >>> remove this semantic patch to avoid having "clean up" patches being > >>> posted over and over in response to these Coccinelle warnings. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold > > > > Is anyone planning on picking this patch up? > > It is already in kbuild.git as commit 1a617a8475e8, I apparenly forgot > to reply to this thread. Ok, great. Thanks, Johan