public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] devicetree: mfd: Add binding for the TI LM3533
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:16:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151030211646.GE24668@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+d+_JgiEfQpgD29AnD+bM7Nq94-5NTjK=LFHNg162UOw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri 30 Oct 13:18 PDT 2015, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> wrote:
> > On Fri 30 Oct 11:42 PDT 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > Rob, please see the discussion regarding ti,boost-freq-khz below. Should
> > we both specify unit at the same time as we use standard units? (This is
> > not the first time I have to change this back and forth)
> >
> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >>
[..]
> > The ti,boost-low-freq from the bq25890 binding is the only other
> > property I can find that describes the same thing. So I'm not sure I
> > follow you here.
> >
> >> Perhaps we need to create a set of generic bindings.
> >>
> >> Also, we usually measure DT bindings in HZ, not kHz.
> 
> Surprisingly, there are not enough examples to draw much conclusion.
> 
> > I thought we had defined frequencies to be in HZ and HZ only, but then
> > Rob's comment that I need to actually specify the unit doesn't make any
> > sense.
> 
> I don't think we decided, but let's decide now. Go with Hz.
> 

+1

> Really, I first prefer the property name has units and second having
> standardized units. But if there is a common property without units, I
> prefer that even more.
> 

You can find this property in a variety of hardware, but I don't think
it would make much sense to define this single property in a common
place today.

This seems to be the first case where we specify the unit on one of
these properties though.

> > Do we want these properties in a standard unit or do we want them
> > specifying the unit? Having both seems excessive.
> 
> You mean "freq" would imply the units? No, we want the actual units in
> the property.
> 

You're right, frequency can be measured in other units than Hz, I can't
think of one that would be applicable here though.

Either way, I'll slap on a unit to the property name - Hz that is...

Thanks for your input.

Regards,
Bjorn

      reply	other threads:[~2015-10-30 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-25 18:09 [PATCH 1/3] devicetree: mfd: Add binding for the TI LM3533 Bjorn Andersson
2015-10-25 18:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] iio: light: lm3533-als: Print error message on invalid resistance Bjorn Andersson
2015-10-27 19:18   ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 18:37     ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-10-28 18:53       ` Joe Perches
2015-10-25 18:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] mfd: lm3533: Support initialization from Device Tree Bjorn Andersson
2015-10-27  7:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] devicetree: mfd: Add binding for the TI LM3533 Rob Herring
2015-10-27 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 " Bjorn Andersson
2015-10-27 16:29   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iio: light: lm3533-als: Print error message on invalid resistance Bjorn Andersson
2015-10-27 16:29   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mfd: lm3533: Support initialization from Device Tree Bjorn Andersson
2015-10-27 16:43     ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-27 16:53     ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-28 11:40     ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 11:50       ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 18:41       ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-10-27 19:21   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] devicetree: mfd: Add binding for the TI LM3533 Rob Herring
2015-10-30 18:42   ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 19:41     ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-10-30 20:18       ` Rob Herring
2015-10-30 21:16         ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151030211646.GE24668@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net \
    --to=bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=jhovold@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox