From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753686AbbKBQIL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:08:11 -0500
Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:35053 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752544AbbKBQIH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:08:07 -0500
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:38:02 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
        "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / OPP: Add "opp-supported-hw" binding
Message-ID: <20151102160802.GH3639@ubuntu>
References: <cover.1446167359.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <2d52388bd7d3cc546ac3ab5afeb47bfcb3012213.1446167359.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <20151030221826.GM19782@codeaurora.org>
 <20151031022003.GV3716@ubuntu>
 <CAL_JsqJ5tyQ11b5p=xigJwD2stPuqk7akJBhNU-NR6sov5uCiA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJ5tyQ11b5p=xigJwD2stPuqk7akJBhNU-NR6sov5uCiA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 02-11-15, 09:13, Rob Herring wrote:
> There is no special meaning, just convention which is the unit-address
> should match the reg property address. I'm okay with an exception
> here.

Thanks, I will update this separately.

-- 
viresh