From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mohit Agrawal <moagrawa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf sched latency: Fix removed thread issue
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 15:33:10 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151103183310.GU21609@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151103074148.GC23878@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:53:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:10:25PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > If machine's thread gets excited (EXIT event is received),
> > > we set thread->dead = true and it is later on removed from
> > > machine's tree if the pid is reused on new thread.
> >
> > > The latency subcommand holds tree of working atoms sorted
> > > by thread's pid/tid. If there's new thread with same pid
> >
> > Humm, wher is the latency subcommand handling the EXIT event?
> >
> > I see:
> >
> > perf_sched__lat
> > perf_sched__read_events
> > session = perf_session__new(&file, false, &sched->tool);
> > perf_session__process_events(session)
> >
> > And sched->tool->exit() is not set, which will make
> > perf_session__process_events(), when calling perf_tool__fill_defaults()
> > set it to process_event_stub() which will do nothing for
> > PERF_RECORD_EXIT events, no?
>
> yep, latency command does not handle EXIT event, but the
> thread is removed via FORK event.. the first changelog
So its not related to processing an EXIT event as described in the
changelog, ok. And I don't see where is that thread->dead is set, i.e.
the sequence is:
machine__process_fork_event()
machine__remove_thread()
The only place where thread->dead is set to true is in thread__exited()
and that is only called by machine__process_exit_event(), which is never
called by 'perf sched'.
It is not "later removed from machine's tree", it is removed straight
away, in __machine__remove_thread().
Anyway, I'm downloading that perf.data file to try to debug this here.
- Arnaldo
> paragraph might be a little misleading sorry ;-)
>
> could you please change it to:
>
> ---
> If machine's thread gets excited (EXIT event is received),
> we set thread->dead = true and it is later on removed from
> machine's tree if the pid is reused on new thread.
>
> We dont handle EXIT command in 'perf sched latency',
> however the old thread is removed anyway when FORK
> event is received for new thrad with same pid/tid.
> ---
>
> thanks,
> jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-03 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-02 11:10 [PATCH] perf sched latency: Fix removed thread issue Jiri Olsa
2015-11-02 22:27 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-11-03 8:04 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-02 22:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-03 7:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-03 18:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-11-04 7:34 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-08 7:31 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf sched latency: Fix thread pid reuse issue tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151103183310.GU21609@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=moagrawa@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox