[PATCH 1/4] sched: Better document the try_to_wake_up() barriers

Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02T13:52:23Z

[-- Attachment #1: peterz-sched-ttwu-comment.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1408 bytes --]

Explain how the control dependency and smp_rmb() end up providing
ACQUIRE semantics and pair with smp_store_release() in
finish_lock_switch().

Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 8 +++++++-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1947,7 +1947,13 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
while (p->on_cpu)
cpu_relax();
/*
- * Pairs with the smp_wmb() in finish_lock_switch().
+ * Combined with the control dependency above, we have an effective
+ * smp_load_acquire() without the need for full barriers.
+ *
+ * Pairs with the smp_store_release() in finish_lock_switch().
+ *
+ * This ensures that tasks getting woken will be fully ordered against
+ * their previous state and preserve Program Order.
*/
smp_rmb();

--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1073,6 +1073,9 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(st
* We must ensure this doesn't happen until the switch is completely
* finished.
*
+ * In particular, the load of prev->state in finish_task_switch() must
+ * happen before this.
+ *
* Pairs with the control dependency and rmb in try_to_wake_up().
*/
smp_store_release(&prev->on_cpu, 0);