From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756323AbbKDSX5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 4 Nov 2015 13:23:57 -0500
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:31381 "EHLO
	userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756300AbbKDSX4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 4 Nov 2015 13:23:56 -0500
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 21:23:43 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
        Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] vfio: make an array larger
Message-ID: <20151104182343.GO18797@mwanda>
References: <20151104132624.GC20966@mwanda>
 <1446655219.21133.48.camel@perches.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1446655219.21133.48.camel@perches.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 08:40:19AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> Doesn't the same thing happen with pci_ext_cap_length?

pci_ext_cap_length is fine as-is but you're right that we probably
should make the size explicit as well.  I will fix and resend.

> Both array declarations might be better as const.

Sure.  I will do this as well.

regards,
dan carpenter