From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756463AbbKEB5J (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:57:09 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:36202 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756432AbbKEB5G (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:57:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:27:01 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Rafael Wysocki , robh+dt@kernel.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, lee.jones@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, nm@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, Kukjin Kim , "moderated list:ARM PORT" , open list , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] ARM: dts: exynos4412: Rename OPP nodes as opp@ Message-ID: <20151105015701.GD2116@ubuntu> References: <563AB620.5090904@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <563AB620.5090904@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05-11-15, 10:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > I see this patch does not depend on the rest of patchset so I presume > this can co through samsung-soc? Yeah, I wouldn't mind that. But I would wait for a confirmation from Rafael for the bindings first, for an unlikely case where he doesn't like the fourth patch ;) -- viresh