From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
"Cyril B." <cbay@alwaysdata.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] livepatch: Cleanup module page permission changes
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 11:40:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151106104055.GL2599@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3427a7aa26f4765c231ae36f3f11f7006a9aa41.1446757977.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
On Thu 2015-11-05 15:18:05, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Calling set_memory_rw() and set_memory_ro() for every iteration of the
> loop in klp_write_object_relocations() is messy, inefficient, and
> error-prone.
>
> Change all the read-only pages to read-write before the loop and convert
> them back to read-only again afterwards.
>
> The {un}set_module_core_ro_nx() functions are used to change the
> page permissions. Toggling NX isn't necessary in this case, but it's
> not highly performance sensitive code so it should be fine.
Hmm, the name (un)set_module_core_ro_nx() still sounds a bit strange,
especially the "ro_nx" suffix. Alternative solution would be to create
set_module_text_rw()
set_module_text_ro()
There already exists
set_all_modules_text_rw()
set_all_modules_text_ro()
They modify only the ro/rw flags. IMHO, the name is more descriptive
They are used by ftrace for very similar purpose.
They modify also the init section. But we might want to touch it
as well. klp_module_notify() is called too late now. But once we
have a more complex consistency model, we will need to reject
the module when the patching fails. We will need to call the
livepatch init earlier, close to ftrace_module_init(mod).
Then the init section might be interesting as well.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-06 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-05 21:18 [PATCH v2 0/3] CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX bug fix and cleanups Josh Poimboeuf
2015-11-05 21:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] livepatch: Fix crash with !CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX Josh Poimboeuf
2015-11-06 10:14 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-11-05 21:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] module: Use the same logic for setting and unsetting RO/NX Josh Poimboeuf
2015-11-08 19:40 ` Rusty Russell
2015-11-05 21:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] livepatch: Cleanup module page permission changes Josh Poimboeuf
2015-11-06 10:40 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2015-11-06 12:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-11-06 13:42 ` Petr Mladek
2015-11-06 17:14 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-11-08 23:01 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151106104055.GL2599@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=cbay@alwaysdata.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox