public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: constify geode ops structures
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 08:42:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151109054253.GQ18797@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1511082220500.2583@hadrien>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2261 bytes --]

On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:24:49PM +0000, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > Cool.  So, in grsec they use a GCC plugin to make these const
> > automatically since they only contain function pointers.  There about
> > 100 struct types marked as __no_const.  Kees would like to adopt the
> > grsec pluggin approach I expect.  Do you have an idea how many structs
> > only contain function pointers or how many consts we would have to add
> > to get the same effect without the plugin?
> 
> My list has 373 type names.  In the list there are counts for good
> (already const) and bad (not const).  The sum of the bad values is 2467.
> The list is below.
> 
> julia

Fantastic!  Thanks.  We could autogenerate the list of type names and
make checkpatch.pl complain if we declared those types as non const.

I ran this command to find which functions grsec marks as __no_const.

egrep '(^ struct |^@@|__no_const;)' grsecurity-3.1-4.2.5-201511021814.patch | grep __no_const -B1 | grep -v __no_const | grep -v '^--' | cut -d @ -f 5-  | cut -b 9- | cut -d ' ' -f 1

There are 60 structs declared as __no_const.  For some structs they
declare a no_const version and use it as needed.  Like this:
typedef struct net_device_ops __no_const net_device_ops_no_const;

grep __no_const grsecurity-3.1-4.2.5-201511021814.patch | grep typedef | cut -d ' ' -f 3

There are 32 of those.

Then I compared to see if their structs were on your list.  For some
reason there quite a few one their list which are not on yours.  Out
of the first 10 about half weren't on your list.  cpu_cache_fns,
outer_cache_fns, psci_operations, smp_operations, omap_hwmod_soc_ops,
smp_ops_t.  These are mostly different arches?

Also bit_table has in int has well as a function pointers but it is on
their list.  I'm not sure why.  Maybe they are marking structs const
that I don't know about.

The other trick that they do is they define structs as __do_const if
they want them to be const by default, which is pretty neat.  This feels
like it should be a standard GCC feature.  In the meantime we could
mark things as __do_const and print a sparse warning if it was declared
as not const.

I have attached the list of __no_const structs.

regards,
dan carpenter



[-- Attachment #2: no_const --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1403 bytes --]

cpu_cache_fns
cpuidle_ops
outer_cache_fns
cpu_user_fns
psci_operations
smp_operations
cpu_pm_ops
omap_hwmod_soc_ops
smp_ops_t
machine_ops
smp_ops
x86_init_ops
x86_cpuinit_ops
x86_platform_ops
x86_msi_ops
x86_io_apic_ops
cryptd_blkcipher_request_ctx
cryptd_aead_request_ctx
od_ops
amd_decoder_ops
kernel_queue_ops
bit_table
af9033_ops
dib_fe_xfer_ops
dib7000p_ops
dib8000_ops
xpc_interface
l2t_skb_cb
ath10k_htc_ops
ath10k_htc_ep_ops
ath_hw_private_ops
ath_hw_ops
bfa_itn_s
bfa_ioc_cbfn_s
bfa_ioc_hwif_s
fbtft_ops
ldlm_callback_suite
md_ops
hal_ops
_io_ops
visorchipset_busdev_notifiers
visorchipset_busdev_responders
via_clock
drm_encoder_helper_funcs
ttm_mem_shrink
cleancache_ops
cipher_tfm
compress_tfm
softirq_action
gpd_dev_ops
rchan_callbacks
rio_ops
renesas_usbhs_driver_callback
cfctrl_rsp
iw_cm_verbs
snd_compr_ops
lane2_ops
rtnl_link
tipc_nl_compat_cmd_dump
tipc_nl_compat_cmd_doit

Sometimes not const:

fw_card_driver
dm_space_map
v4l2_ioctl_info
xpc_arch_operations
drm_info_list
clk_ops
global_attr
cpuidle_state
device_attribute
efivar_operations
fb_ops
file_operations
sensor_device_attribute
sensor_device_attribute_2
i2c_algorithm
irq_chip
irq_chip
kobj_attribute
vm_operations_struct
module_attribute
net_device_ops
notifier_block
hotplug_slot_ops
dev_pm_domain
user_regset
seq_operations
ctl_table
attribute
attribute_group
bin_attribute
libfc_function_template
fc_function_template

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-09  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-08 21:34 [PATCH] video: constify geode ops structures Julia Lawall
2015-11-08 22:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-08 22:24   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-09  5:42     ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2015-11-09  6:09       ` Joe Perches
2015-11-09  6:39       ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-09 13:30         ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Carpenter
2015-11-09 18:12           ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-09 18:19             ` Joe Perches
2015-11-09 13:49       ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-09 14:50         ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-09 16:39           ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-09 17:05           ` Emese Revfy
2015-11-09 17:48             ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-09 21:24               ` Kees Cook
2015-11-09 21:55                 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-09 23:34                   ` Kees Cook
2015-11-10  1:24                     ` PaX Team
2015-11-10 15:44       ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-09 21:20   ` Kees Cook
2015-11-10  6:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-10 20:34       ` Kees Cook
2015-11-10 20:49         ` Joe Perches
2015-11-10 22:02           ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-10 22:17             ` Joe Perches
2015-11-10 22:34               ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-10 22:39                 ` Joe Perches
2015-11-24 11:28 ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151109054253.GQ18797@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox