From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: sanjeev sharma <sanjeevsharmaengg@gmail.com>
Cc: "Sharma, Sanjeev" <Sanjeev_Sharma@mentor.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"m.szyprowski@samsung.com" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev()
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:08:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151109100804.GA24936@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGUYZuQDiH_xzinEJ952rw9GuA9oUQSNASaNdOE1x_i97XCBrw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:29:17AM +0530, sanjeev sharma wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 10:39:13AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 03:26:48PM +0530, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> > > _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() treat DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL similar to
> > > DMA_TO_DEVICE which means that destination buffer is device
> > > memory,means cpu may have written some data to source buffer and
> > > data may be in cache line.For cleaner operation we need to call
> > > outer_flush_range() which will clean and invalidate outer cache lines.
> >
> > Why isn't the clean sufficient in this case? We're mapping the buffer
> > to the device, so we clean the dirty lines in the CPU caches and make
> > them visible to the device. If the CPU later wants to read the buffer
> > (i.e. after the device has DMA'd into it), you'll need to map the
> > buffer to the CPU, which will perform the invalidation of the CPU caches.
>
> Indeed. bidirectional mode is already handled prefectly well by this
> code. No patches are required.
>
> Thanks Russell & Will for providing input.
>
> Let's assume , CPU don't read the buffer then there could be the problem
> correct ? IMO, to handle every use case outer_flush_range can be used ?
> If still it doesn't make sense to use flush on bidirectional mappings, then
> FIXME comment should be removed from the function to avoid any
> Confusion.
>
>
>
> Please let me know what you think on above comment ?
I still don't understand the problem that you're trying to fix.
Sorry,
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-09 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-04 9:56 [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() Sanjeev Sharma
2015-11-04 10:39 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-04 10:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-05 5:56 ` Sharma, Sanjeev
[not found] ` <CAGUYZuQDiH_xzinEJ952rw9GuA9oUQSNASaNdOE1x_i97XCBrw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-11-09 10:08 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-11-09 10:15 ` Sharma, Sanjeev
2015-11-09 10:50 ` Robin Murphy
2015-11-09 12:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151109100804.GA24936@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=Sanjeev_Sharma@mentor.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=sanjeevsharmaengg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox