From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751708AbbKJEMJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2015 23:12:09 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:36170 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751406AbbKJEMI (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2015 23:12:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 20:12:00 -0800 From: "Gavin O'Leary" To: benjamin.romer@unisys.com Cc: david.kershner@unisys.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sparmaintainer@unisys.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: visorbus_main.c: made checkpatch warning-free Message-ID: <20151110041200.GA8558@gavin-VirtualBox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Made visorbus_main.c checkpatch warning-free by fixing the comment style issues. Signed-off-by: Gavin O'Leary --- drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c index a272b48..eac97d2 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c @@ -1078,7 +1078,8 @@ away: } /* Write the contents of to the struct - * spar_vbus_channel_protocol.chp_info. */ + * spar_vbus_channel_protocol.chp_info. + */ static int write_vbus_chp_info(struct visorchannel *chan, @@ -1096,7 +1097,8 @@ write_vbus_chp_info(struct visorchannel *chan, } /* Write the contents of to the struct - * spar_vbus_channel_protocol.bus_info. */ + * spar_vbus_channel_protocol.bus_info. + */ static int write_vbus_bus_info(struct visorchannel *chan, @@ -1370,7 +1372,8 @@ pause_state_change_complete(struct visor_device *dev, int status) /* Notify the chipset driver that the pause is complete, which * will presumably want to send some sort of response to the - * initiator. */ + * initiator. + */ (*chipset_responders.device_pause) (dev, status); } @@ -1390,7 +1393,8 @@ resume_state_change_complete(struct visor_device *dev, int status) /* Notify the chipset driver that the resume is complete, * which will presumably want to send some sort of response to - * the initiator. */ + * the initiator. + */ (*chipset_responders.device_resume) (dev, status); } @@ -1437,7 +1441,8 @@ initiate_chipset_device_pause_resume(struct visor_device *dev, bool is_pause) * existing problem prevents us from ever getting a bus * resume... This hack would fail to work should we * ever have a bus that contains NO devices, since we - * would never even get here in that case. */ + * would never even get here in that case. + */ fix_vbus_dev_info(dev); if (!drv->resume) goto away; -- 1.9.1