From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 08:53:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151112075313.GA5984@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02ef9e0e0b73591aa8ec37aae2409274d108af60.1447093569.git.tony.luck@intel.com>
* Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
> Using __copy_user_nocache() as inspiration create a memory copy
> routine for use by kernel code with annotations to allow for
> recovery from machine checks.
>
> Notes:
> 1) Unlike the original we make no attempt to copy all the bytes
> up to the faulting address. The original achieves that by
> re-executing the failing part as a byte-by-byte copy,
> which will take another page fault. We don't want to have
> a second machine check!
> 2) Likewise the return value for the original indicates exactly
> how many bytes were not copied. Instead we provide the physical
> address of the fault (thanks to help from do_machine_check()
> +extern phys_addr_t mcsafe_memcpy(void *dst, const void __user *src,
> + unsigned size);
So what's the longer term purpose, where will mcsafe_memcpy() be used?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-12 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-09 18:26 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Tony Luck
2015-11-06 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, ras: Add new infrastructure for machine check fixup tables Tony Luck
2015-11-10 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-10 22:05 ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-12 4:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-12 19:44 ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-12 20:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-12 21:17 ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-06 21:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas Tony Luck
2015-11-10 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-10 22:11 ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-11 11:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-12 4:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-12 19:55 ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-06 21:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks Tony Luck
2015-11-12 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-11-12 20:01 ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-27 10:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-08 21:30 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-08 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-14 9:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-09 18:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Tony Luck
2015-11-10 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-10 21:55 ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-11 20:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-11 21:48 ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-11 22:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-11 22:32 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151112075313.GA5984@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox