From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: hide push_irq_work_func declaration
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:16:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151112101620.2dcd5dce@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151112145331.GC17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:53:31 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:22:22PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI)
> > static void push_irq_work_func(struct irq_work *work);
> > #endif
>
> I think we can get tid of the whole HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI thing after:
> 8053871d0f7f ("smp: Fix smp_call_function_single_async() locking")
>
> That should allow us to use smp_calling_function_single_async() instead
> of irq_work_queue_on(), removing the dependency on irq_work.
Interesting. I'll have to take a look at that.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-12 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-12 14:22 [PATCH] sched/rt: hide push_irq_work_func declaration Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-12 14:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-12 15:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-12 15:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-12 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-12 15:16 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2015-11-12 16:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-12 16:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-23 16:17 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/rt: Hide the push_irq_work_func() declaration tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151112101620.2dcd5dce@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox