Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports.

[Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:48:32PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 16 November 2015 at 17:43, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:32:05PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux
> >> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >> > Please sensibly wrap your messages.  Your lines are longer than 80
> >> > characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply
> >> > to your very very very very very very very very very very very very
> >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> >> > very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting
> >> > them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that
> >> > kind of additional work?  Thanks.
> >>
> >> His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters.
> >> You should probably look into fixing your MUA.
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Standard net etiquette is that email should be wrapped around 72
> > characters to give space for reply indentation to remain readable
> > on an 80 column screen. Most of my email replies are written on an
> > 80 column screen.
> 
> Oh, I just thought there was
> a greater reason for your
> 660-character tantrum

Sorry, I've stopped reading at this point, at the point where you start
slinging crap around.  If you have a serious point to make, maybe you
could grow up in the next five minutes and write a proper email, thanks.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.