From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:38:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151117013830.GV8456@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447673600-8881-2-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:33:14PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> for_each_available_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration,
> so a return from the middle of the loop requires an of_node_put.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
> follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> @@
>
> for_each_available_child_of_node(root, child) {
> ... when != of_node_put(child)
> when != e = child
> (
> return child;
> |
> * return ...;
> )
> ...
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>
> ---
For this patch:
Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
> drivers/phy/phy-brcmstb-sata.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
[snip patch, which fixes of_node_put() handling for
for_each_available_child_of_node() loop, which creates PHY devices with
devm_phy_create()]
This reminds me of a potential problem I'm looking at in other
subsystems: from code reading (I haven't seen any issues in practice,
probably because I don't use OF_DYNAMIC) it looks like device-creating
infrastructure like the PHY subsystem should be acquiring a reference to
the device_node when they stash it away. But drivers/phy/phy-core.c does
not do this, AFAICT.
See phy_create(), which does
phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node;
and later might reuse this of_node pointer, even though it never called
of_node_get() on this node.
Potential patch to fix this (not tested).
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
index fc48fac003a6..8df29caeeef9 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
@@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
phy->dev.class = phy_class;
phy->dev.parent = dev;
phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node;
+ of_node_get(phy->dev.of_node);
phy->id = id;
phy->ops = ops;
@@ -726,6 +727,7 @@ struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
return phy;
put_dev:
+ of_node_put(phy->dev.of_node);
put_device(&phy->dev); /* calls phy_release() which frees resources */
return ERR_PTR(ret);
@@ -775,6 +777,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_phy_create);
*/
void phy_destroy(struct phy *phy)
{
+ of_node_put(phy->dev.of_node);
pm_runtime_disable(&phy->dev);
device_unregister(&phy->dev);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-17 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-16 11:33 [PATCH 0/7] add missing of_node_put Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 1:38 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2015-11-17 6:12 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 17:44 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 17:48 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 18:30 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 18:34 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 22:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 19:05 ` device_node lifetime (was: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put) Brian Norris
2015-11-18 20:39 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-19 18:44 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-19 19:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-27 14:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] phy: mt65xx-usb3: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] phy: berlin-sata: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-19 20:48 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] phy: rockchip-usb: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 19:27 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:31 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:46 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 20:38 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:40 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 21:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] phy: miphy28lp: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] phy: miphy365x: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] phy: cygnus: pcie: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 17:12 ` Ray Jui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151117013830.GV8456@google.com \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.0xf0@gmail.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox