From: Dave Penkler <dpenkler@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
peter.chen@freescale.com, teuniz@gmail.com,
USB <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] Implement an ioctl to support the USMTMC-USB488 READ_STATUS_BYTE operation.
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:12:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151118081247.GA1776@slacky> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VdXEyk6KC6Rgt4SGnCCbBrszFOr5iZfSkSFvmxfu2u_Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Andy,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:04:10PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Dave Penkler <dpenkler@gmail.com> wrote:
snip
> > +
>
> Redundant empty line.
>
ok
>
> > + data->iin_bTag = 2;
>
> Hmm??? Why 2?
> A-ha, below I found a comment. Something might be good to have here as well.
>
Added comment
> > +
>
> Redundant empty line.
>
ok
> > +
> > + if (data->iin_buffer[0] & 0x80) {
> > + /* check for valid STB notification */
> > + if ((data->iin_buffer[0] & 0x7f) > 1) {
>
> It's the same as
> if (data->iin_buffer[0] & 0x7e) {
>
Yes but when reading the spec and the code it is more obvious that here
we are testing for the value in bits D6..D0 to be a valid iin_bTag return.
(See Table 7 in the USBTMC-USB488 spec.)
> > + dev_dbg(&data->intf->dev,
> > + "%s - urb terminated, status: %d\n",
>
> I heard that dynamic debug adds function name.
>
> > + __func__, status);
I checked in device.h and could not find any trace of it. I'm on 4.4.0-rc1.
> > +static void usbtmc_free_int(struct usbtmc_device_data *data)
> > +{
> > + if (data->iin_ep_present) {
> > + if (data->iin_urb) {
>
> Why not
>
> if (!data->iin_ep_present || !data->iin_urb)
> return;
>
> ?
>
OK
Thanks,
-Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-18 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-15 18:34 [PATCH v4 0/5] usb: usbtmc: Add support for missing functions in USBTMC-USB488 spec Dave Penkler
2015-11-15 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] Implement an ioctl to support the USMTMC-USB488 READ_STATUS_BYTE operation Dave Penkler
2015-11-15 20:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-11-18 8:12 ` Dave Penkler [this message]
2015-11-15 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] Add support for USBTMC USB488 SRQ notification with fasync Dave Penkler
2015-11-15 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] Add support for receiving USBTMC USB488 SRQ notifications via poll/select Dave Penkler
2015-11-15 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] Add ioctl to retrieve USBTMC-USB488 capabilities Dave Penkler
2015-11-15 18:40 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] Add ioctls to enable and disable local controls on an instrument Dave Penkler
2015-11-15 20:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-11-18 8:27 ` Dave Penkler
2015-11-15 19:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] usb: usbtmc: Add support for missing functions in USBTMC-USB488 spec Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151118081247.GA1776@slacky \
--to=dpenkler@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.chen@freescale.com \
--cc=teuniz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox