From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf test: Add bpf-output event
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:26:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151118192603.GA374@us.ibm.com> (raw)
>From 8f71d55dd3e27e6ca2138e3ed6dfeceb1c00a426 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:06:08 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] perf test: Add bpf-output event
The kernel has added support for 'PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT' but that is
missing from the perf tool. Among other things, results in the 'roundtrip
evsel->name check' test case of 'perf test' failing on Powerpc.
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 1 +
tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 4 ++++
tools/perf/util/parse-events.l | 1 +
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 397fb4e..2033632 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ const char *perf_evsel__sw_names[PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX] = {
"alignment-faults",
"emulation-faults",
"dummy",
+ "bpf-output",
};
static const char *__perf_evsel__sw_name(u64 config)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
index e48d9da..40ae92a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -124,6 +124,10 @@ struct event_symbol event_symbols_sw[PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX] = {
.symbol = "dummy",
.alias = "",
},
+ [PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT] = {
+ .symbol = "bpf-output",
+ .alias = "",
+ },
};
#define __PERF_EVENT_FIELD(config, name) \
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l
index 58c5831..380298d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ cpu-migrations|migrations { return sym(yyscanner, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, PERF_COU
alignment-faults { return sym(yyscanner, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, PERF_COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS); }
emulation-faults { return sym(yyscanner, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS); }
dummy { return sym(yyscanner, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY); }
+bpf-output { return sym(yyscanner, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT); }
/*
* We have to handle the kernel PMU event cycles-ct/cycles-t/mem-loads/mem-stores separately.
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-11-18 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-18 19:26 Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
2015-11-18 20:50 ` [PATCH] perf test: Add bpf-output event Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-18 23:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-19 1:37 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 23:29 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-11-20 2:22 ` Wangnan (F)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151118192603.GA374@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox