From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] asm-generic: default BUG_ON(x) to "if(x) BUG()"
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:34:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151123163449.GS8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5868782.RxZY0W5S4d@wuerfel>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:25:28PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This patch picks the second choice, and changes the NOP to BUG(), which
> normally stops the execution of the current thread in some form (endless
> loop or a trap). This follows the logic we applied in a4b5d580e078 ("bug:
> Make BUG() always stop the machine").
I think this is a very good thing. It changes things from "something went
wrong, we'll silently continue as if nothing happened and possibly corrupt
your data" to "something went wrong, halt or reboot the system" (depending
on the config choices and kernel configuration.)
IMHO, for a closed box device, the latter has _always_ got to be better
than the former.
I think people who argue against this forget that BUG() is only supposed
to be used when a serious error which results in data corruption has
occurred. It isn't a general purpose reimplementation of userspace
assert(), which commonly gets used by programmers as a subsitute for
proper error handling.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-23 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-23 16:25 [RFC] asm-generic: default BUG_ON(x) to "if(x) BUG()" Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 16:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 16:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-23 16:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 16:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 17:04 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-23 19:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 16:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-11-23 20:16 ` Josh Triplett
2015-11-23 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 21:17 ` Josh Triplett
2015-11-23 21:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151123163449.GS8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox