From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: let of_clk_get_parent_name() fail for invalid clock-indices
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:53:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151124005324.GM19156@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASQGBn32N4=CM+notaVv1ZLotaydRhe-GiOF6nLhbmABA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/22, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2015-11-21 2:45 GMT+09:00 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>:
> >
> > What is np pointing at? Something like:
> >
> > consumer {
> > clocks = <&oscillator 0>;
> > };
> >
> > Which would be invalid DT because oscillator doesn't have an
> > output for index 0?
>
>
> You are right. My example was confusing.
>
>
>
> oscillator: oscillator {
> compatible = "myclocktype";
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> clock-indices = <1>, <3>;
> clock-output-names = "clka", "clkb";
> };
>
> consumer {
> compatible = "myclockconsumer";
> clocks = <&oscillator 0>;
> };
>
> Currently, of_clk_get_parent_name(consumer_np, 0) returns "clks", but
> should return NULL;
>
> I will rephrase the git-log in v2.
>
Ok. Thanks.
> > Why can't we leave everything in place and check count == len at
> > the end? i.e.
> >
> > of_property_for_each_u32(clkspec.np, "clock-indices", prop, vp, pv) {
> > if (index == pv) {
> > index = count;
> > break;
> > }
> > count++;
> > }
> >
> > if (count == of_property_count_u32_elems(clkspec.np, "clock-indices"))
> > return NULL
> >
>
>
> Of course we can, although we have to mention "clock-indices" twice.
>
> A good thing for of_get_property() is that we can get both the value
> and the length
> at the same time.
>
Ok. Well if we don't want to count them again, perhaps a goto
jump over an unconditional return NULL would be better?
of_property_for_each_u32(clkspec.np, "clock-indices", prop, vp, pv) {
if (index == pv) {
index = count;
goto found;
}
count++;
}
return NULL;
found:
Or since the macro for of_property_for_each_u32() tests the vp
poitner for NULL, we can check that pointer too...
of_property_for_each_u32(clkspec.np, "clock-indices", prop, vp, pv) {
if (index == pv) {
index = count;
break;
}
count++;
}
/* We didn't find anything */
if (!vp)
return NULL;
I guess I prefer the latter approach here.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-24 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-20 7:36 [PATCH 1/3] clk: remove redundant negative index check in of_clk_get_parent_name() Masahiro Yamada
2015-11-20 7:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] clk: let of_clk_get_parent_name() fail for invalid clock-indices Masahiro Yamada
2015-11-20 17:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-11-22 6:03 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-11-24 0:53 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-11-30 8:34 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-12-01 0:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-11-20 7:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] clk: split of_clk_get_parent_name() into two functions Masahiro Yamada
2015-11-21 0:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-11-22 5:44 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-11-24 4:25 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-12-01 0:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-12-01 1:51 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-11-20 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] clk: remove redundant negative index check in of_clk_get_parent_name() Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151124005324.GM19156@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox