From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 4/7] ring-buffer: Use READ_ONCE() for most tail_page access
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:08:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151125160912.548075321@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20151125160838.739491216@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0004-ring-buffer-Use-READ_ONCE-for-most-tail_page-access.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3139 bytes --]
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
As cpu_buffer->tail_page may be modified by interrupts at almost any time,
the flow of logic is very important. Do not let gcc get smart with
re-reading cpu_buffer->tail_page by adding READ_ONCE() around most of its
accesses.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 9c6045a27ba3..ab102e6259bc 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ static int rb_tail_page_update(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
* it is, then it is up to us to update the tail
* pointer.
*/
- if (tail_page == cpu_buffer->tail_page) {
+ if (tail_page == READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page)) {
/* Zero the write counter */
unsigned long val = old_write & ~RB_WRITE_MASK;
unsigned long eval = old_entries & ~RB_WRITE_MASK;
@@ -2036,12 +2036,15 @@ rb_handle_head_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
* the tail page would have moved.
*/
if (ret == RB_PAGE_NORMAL) {
+ struct buffer_page *buffer_tail_page;
+
+ buffer_tail_page = READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page);
/*
* If the tail had moved passed next, then we need
* to reset the pointer.
*/
- if (cpu_buffer->tail_page != tail_page &&
- cpu_buffer->tail_page != next_page)
+ if (buffer_tail_page != tail_page &&
+ buffer_tail_page != next_page)
rb_head_page_set_normal(cpu_buffer, new_head,
next_page,
RB_PAGE_HEAD);
@@ -2362,7 +2365,7 @@ rb_try_to_discard(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
addr = (unsigned long)event;
addr &= PAGE_MASK;
- bpage = cpu_buffer->tail_page;
+ bpage = READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page);
if (bpage->page == (void *)addr && rb_page_write(bpage) == old_index) {
unsigned long write_mask =
@@ -2410,7 +2413,7 @@ rb_set_commit_to_write(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
again:
max_count = cpu_buffer->nr_pages * 100;
- while (cpu_buffer->commit_page != cpu_buffer->tail_page) {
+ while (cpu_buffer->commit_page != READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page)) {
if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, !(--max_count)))
return;
if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
@@ -2443,7 +2446,7 @@ rb_set_commit_to_write(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
* and pushed the tail page forward, we will be left with
* a dangling commit that will never go forward.
*/
- if (unlikely(cpu_buffer->commit_page != cpu_buffer->tail_page))
+ if (unlikely(cpu_buffer->commit_page != READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page)))
goto again;
}
@@ -2699,7 +2702,8 @@ __rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
if (unlikely(info->add_timestamp))
info->length += RB_LEN_TIME_EXTEND;
- tail_page = info->tail_page = cpu_buffer->tail_page;
+ /* Don't let the compiler play games with cpu_buffer->tail_page */
+ tail_page = info->tail_page = READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->tail_page);
write = local_add_return(info->length, &tail_page->write);
/* set write to only the index of the write */
--
2.6.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-25 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 16:08 [for-next][PATCH 0/7] tracing: Updates for 4.5 (and some stuff going into 4.4) Steven Rostedt
2015-11-25 16:08 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/7] ring-buffer: Update read stamp with first real commit on page Steven Rostedt
2015-11-25 16:08 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/7] ring-buffer: Put back the length if crossed page with add_timestamp Steven Rostedt
2015-11-25 16:08 ` [for-next][PATCH 3/7] ftracetest: Add instance create and delete test Steven Rostedt
2015-11-25 16:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-09 5:09 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-12-11 19:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-01-15 5:08 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-01-15 17:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-01-18 5:47 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-18 12:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-18 14:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-25 16:08 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2015-11-25 16:08 ` [for-next][PATCH 5/7] ring-buffer: Remove redundant update of page timestamp Steven Rostedt
2015-11-25 16:08 ` [for-next][PATCH 6/7] ring-buffer: Process commits whenever moving to a new page Steven Rostedt
2015-11-25 20:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-25 16:08 ` [for-next][PATCH 7/7] tracing: Update cond flag when enabling or disabling a trigger Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151125160912.548075321@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox