Re: [RFC 1/1] xen: block: correct setting for xen_blkif_max_ring_order

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>]

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:26:01PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> According to this piece code:
> "
>      pr_info("Invalid max_ring_order (%d), will use default max: %d.\n",
>               xen_blkif_max_ring_order, XENBUS_MAX_RING_GRANT_ORDER);
> "
> if xen_blkif_max_ring_order is bigger that XENBUS_MAX_RING_GRANT_ORDER,
> need to set xen_blkif_max_ring_order using XENBUS_MAX_RING_GRANT_ORDER,
> but not 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> ---
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am new to xen and reading related soure code, not sure whether
> this is correct. Please comments.

Applied to 'devel/for-jens-4.5'.

Thanks!
> 
> Thanks
> 
>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> index 0823a96..883b9fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -2126,7 +2126,7 @@ static int __init xlblk_init(void)
>  	if (xen_blkif_max_ring_order > XENBUS_MAX_RING_PAGE_ORDER) {
>  		pr_info("Invalid max_ring_order (%d), will use default max: %d.\n",
>  			xen_blkif_max_ring_order, XENBUS_MAX_RING_PAGE_ORDER);
> -		xen_blkif_max_ring_order = 0;
> +		xen_blkif_max_ring_order = XENBUS_MAX_RING_PAGE_ORDER;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!xen_has_pv_disk_devices())
> -- 
> 2.6.2
>