public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf callchain: Stop resolving callchains after invalid address
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:43:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151126074335.GA18742@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448521700-32062-2-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>


* Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:

> Unwinding optimized binaries using frame pointer gives garbage.  Check
> callchain address and stop if it's under vm.mmap_min_addr sysctl value.
> 
> Before:
>   $ perf report --stdio --no-children -g callee
>   ...
> 
>    1.37%  perf    [kernel.vmlinux]    [k] smp_call_function_single
>                |
>                ---smp_call_function_single
>                   _perf_event_enable
>                   perf_event_for_each_child
>                   perf_ioctl
>                   do_vfs_ioctl
>                   sys_ioctl
>                   entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
>                   __GI___ioctl
>                   0
>                   0
>                   0x1c5aa70
>                   0x1c5b910
>                   0x1c5aa70
>                   0x1c5b910
>                   0x1c5aa70
>                   0x1c5b910
>                   0x1c5aa70
>                   0x1c5b910
>                   0x1c5aa70
>                   0x1c5b910
> 		  ...
> 
> After:
>   $ perf report --stdio --no-children -g callee
>   ...
> 
>    1.37%  perf    [kernel.vmlinux]    [k] smp_call_function_single
>                |
>                ---smp_call_function_single
>                   _perf_event_enable
>                   perf_event_for_each_child
>                   perf_ioctl
>                   do_vfs_ioctl
>                   sys_ioctl
>                   entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
>                   __GI___ioctl

In addition to that, would it make sense to terminate the callchain with an 
indicator that we found something anomalous? Such an extra line:

                    ...

would not be intrusive, but would tell the informed reader that it's not a normal 
ending of the call chain.

This assumes that we can tell apart 'normal end of call chain' from 'seems to end 
with garbage poiner' cases - can do we that?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-26  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-26  7:08 [PATCH 1/3] perf top: Fix freeze on --call-graph flat/folded Namhyung Kim
2015-11-26  7:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf callchain: Stop resolving callchains after invalid address Namhyung Kim
2015-11-26  7:43   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-11-26 14:12     ` Namhyung Kim
2015-11-27  7:48       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-26 13:14   ` David Ahern
2015-11-26 15:00     ` Namhyung Kim
2015-11-26 15:48       ` David Ahern
2015-11-26 15:58         ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-26 16:19           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-12-02  5:20             ` Namhyung Kim
2015-11-26  7:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf callchain: Honor hide_unresolved Namhyung Kim
2015-11-26  8:46   ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-26 16:20     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-27  7:43   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2015-11-26  8:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf top: Fix freeze on --call-graph flat/folded Jiri Olsa
2015-11-26 13:52   ` Namhyung Kim
2015-11-26 14:00     ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-26 15:10       ` Namhyung Kim
2015-11-26 15:22         ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-26 16:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-27  7:43 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151126074335.GA18742@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox