From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>,
sjenning@redhat.com, jikos@kernel.org, vojtech@suse.com,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
guohanjun@huawei.com, dingtianhong@huawei.com,
xiexiuqi@huawei.com, zhouchengming1@huawei.com,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] livepatch: fix race between enabled_store() and klp_unregister_patch()
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:53:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151201155337.GD12513@treble.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565D5F4F.8020807@suse.cz>
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:50:23AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 12/01/2015, 02:11 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > When I try to recreate something similar by putting a delay in
> > enabled_store(), klp_free_patch() just sleeps on its call to
> > kobject_put() until enabled_store() returns. The unregister stack looks
> > like:
> >
> > [<ffffffff812e966b>] __kernfs_remove+0x1fb/0x380
> > [<ffffffff812ea273>] kernfs_remove+0x23/0x40
> > [<ffffffff812ec601>] sysfs_remove_dir+0x51/0x80
> > [<ffffffff81407fb8>] kobject_del+0x18/0x50
> > [<ffffffff8140804a>] kobject_release+0x5a/0x190
> > [<ffffffff81407f27>] kobject_put+0x27/0x50
>
> What about _put outside of klp_mutex in klp_unregister_patch (and maybe
> the other _put's as well)? Plus Li Bin's patch.
This approach sounds the best to me. I think all _put's for the patch
kobj need to be outside the mutex. There's also a _put for the patch
kobj in the klp_init_patch() error path which needs to be moved out.
I think the rest of the _put's (for object and func kobjs) are fine as
they are, because they don't have corresponding sysfs functions which
get the mutex.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-01 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-30 3:54 [PATCH] livepatch: fix race between enabled_store() and klp_unregister_patch() Li Bin
2015-11-30 13:53 ` Petr Mladek
2015-12-01 1:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-12-01 2:46 ` libin
2015-12-01 8:50 ` Jiri Slaby
2015-12-01 14:13 ` Petr Mladek
2015-12-01 14:28 ` Jiri Slaby
2015-12-01 16:57 ` Petr Mladek
2015-12-01 15:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2015-12-15 8:14 ` Miroslav Benes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151201155337.GD12513@treble.redhat.com \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.com \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=zhouchengming1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox