From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751991AbbLCGFe (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 01:05:34 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:35638 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbbLCGFb (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 01:05:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 11:35:27 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Ben Gamari , Sudeep Holla Cc: Thomas Abraham , Sylwester Nawrocki , Michael Turquette , Kukjin Kim , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Tomasz Figa , Lukasz Majewski , Heiko Stuebner , Chanwoo Choi , Kevin Hilman , Javier Martinez Canillas , Tobias Jakobi , Anand Moon , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 Message-ID: <20151203060527.GH4302@ubuntu> References: <1449091167-20758-1-git-send-email-ben@smart-cactus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1449091167-20758-1-git-send-email-ben@smart-cactus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ben, On 02-12-15, 22:19, Ben Gamari wrote: > > This patch series adds cpufreq support for the Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 > SOCs. In particular, it adds support for operating-points-v2 bindings to the > arm-big-little cpufreq driver and updates the above-mentioned SOCs' devicetrees > to take advantage of this support. There are also a couple of patches improving > the clarify of the arm-big-little implementation. It is built on a set posted > by Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz in April 2015. > > The most signficant change from the original series is porting to the > operating-points-v2 devicetree bindings. The series has been tested by me on > and Odroid XU4 and by Javier Martinez Canillas on a Peach Pit. Thanks for working with opp-v2 bindings, really appreciate it. But, before I start reviewing this series, I have few comments. - We weren't able to use cpufreq-dt driver for big LITTLE platforms earlier, as it never had multi cluster support and we wanted clock-sharing information via DT. - That is all fixed now. - I want Samsung's big LITTLE platforms to use cpufreq-dt and drop arm_big_little driver completely. - The only case for which it (arm_big_little) driver might be useful is the IKS solution. Which I don't believe you are going to use in future :) My plan for the arm-big-little driver: - Migrate all platforms to use cpufreq-dt instead for non-IKS solution - Make arm-big-little driver arm-big-little-iks only driver. @Sudeep: What would it take you to use cpufreq-dt for ARM's platforms ? -- viresh