From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Clear the root_domain cpumasks in init_rootdomain()
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:28:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203082800.GA2321@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565FAC78.3030205@redhat.com>
* Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 12/03/2015 at 12:25 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:12:30PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> On 12/02/2015 at 08:34 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:52:59PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> >>>> The patch cleans the garbage by using zalloc_cpumask_var()
> >>>> instead of alloc_cpumask_var() for root_domain::rto_mask
> >>>> allocation, thereby addressing the issues.
> >>> How did you notice this? Also do we want to do the same for the kmalloc
> >> When doing review.
> > Nice, will you be looking for similar issues elsewhere in the scheduler
> > too?
>
> Sure :-)
Hm, is the alloc_cpumask_var() done in alloc_sched_domains() safe?
At least the usage pattern in init_sched_domains() looks unsafe:
doms_cur = alloc_sched_domains(ndoms_cur);
if (!doms_cur)
doms_cur = &fallback_doms;
cpumask_andnot(doms_cur[0], cpu_map, cpu_isolated_map);
I think alloc_cpumask_var() is a fundamentally unsafe or at least fragile
operation, because the uninitialized variable bug will only happen on large CPU
count kernels AFAICS - so it's inviting such bugs.
How about we rename alloc_cpumask_var() to alloc_cpumask_var_noinit() or at least
__alloc_cpumask_var(), to make this property easier to see?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-03 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-02 11:52 [PATCH] sched/core: Clear the root_domain cpumasks in init_rootdomain() Xunlei Pang
2015-12-02 12:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-02 13:12 ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-02 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-03 2:44 ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-03 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-12-03 11:52 ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-04 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-04 8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-04 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-04 8:28 ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-04 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-03 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-04 11:52 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Xunlei Pang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151203082800.GA2321@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox