public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Clear the root_domain cpumasks in init_rootdomain()
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:28:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203082800.GA2321@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565FAC78.3030205@redhat.com>


* Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Peter,
> 
> On 12/03/2015 at 12:25 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:12:30PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> On 12/02/2015 at 08:34 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:52:59PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> >>>> The patch cleans the garbage by using zalloc_cpumask_var()
> >>>> instead of alloc_cpumask_var() for root_domain::rto_mask
> >>>> allocation, thereby addressing the issues.
> >>> How did you notice this? Also do we want to do the same for the kmalloc
> >> When doing review.
> > Nice, will you be looking for similar issues elsewhere in the scheduler
> > too?
> 
> Sure :-)

Hm, is the alloc_cpumask_var() done in alloc_sched_domains() safe?

At least the usage pattern in init_sched_domains() looks unsafe:

        doms_cur = alloc_sched_domains(ndoms_cur);
        if (!doms_cur)
                doms_cur = &fallback_doms;
        cpumask_andnot(doms_cur[0], cpu_map, cpu_isolated_map);

I think alloc_cpumask_var() is a fundamentally unsafe or at least fragile 
operation, because the uninitialized variable bug will only happen on large CPU 
count kernels AFAICS - so it's inviting such bugs.

How about we rename alloc_cpumask_var() to alloc_cpumask_var_noinit() or at least 
__alloc_cpumask_var(), to make this property easier to see?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-03  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-02 11:52 [PATCH] sched/core: Clear the root_domain cpumasks in init_rootdomain() Xunlei Pang
2015-12-02 12:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-02 13:12   ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-02 16:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-03  2:44       ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-03  8:28         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-12-03 11:52           ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-04  8:09             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-04  8:27               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-04  8:30                 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-04  8:28               ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-04  8:30                 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-03  9:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-04 11:52 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Xunlei Pang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151203082800.GA2321@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox