From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932840AbbLCJJI (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 04:09:08 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:42772 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932417AbbLCJIf (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 04:08:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:08:30 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" Cc: "Chrzaniuk, Hubert" , "mchehab@osg.samsung.com" , "dougthompson@xmission.com" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Snow, Jim M" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] EDAC: add DDR4 flag Message-ID: <20151203090830.GA22271@pd.tnic> References: <1449070712-15177-1-git-send-email-hubert.chrzaniuk@intel.com> <1449070712-15177-2-git-send-email-hubert.chrzaniuk@intel.com> <20151202192759.GN3783@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:51:47AM +0000, Anaczkowski, Lukasz wrote: > Well, although it may sound strange, yeah this is exactly the case, since > EDAC for Knights Landing has been for a while in our private branch. > > Is this sort of an issue or just curiosity? Well, the fact that I'm asking, means it is not clear who did what. Please document that like this: Signed-off-by: Random J Developer [lucky@maintainer.example.org: struct foo moved from foo.c to foo.h] Signed-off-by: Lucky K Maintainer (example is from Documentation/SubmittingPatches where the whole authorship tracking is explained in detail.) Alternatively, you can put it in free text in the commit message. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.