From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xfstest failure with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:43:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203164342.GA14849@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151203065127.GB26718@dastard>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 05:51:27PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> As it is, that test does not fail on my DAX testing on RAM disks.
> ISTR it failing up until recently, though. Yeah:
>
> Last login: Tue Nov 17 08:45:55 2015 from 192.168.1.103
> $ cd ~/src/xfstests-dev; sudo mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 ; sudo xfs_admin -U generate /dev/ram0 ; sudo MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o dax" ./check -g auto
> SECTION -- xfs
> FSTYP -- xfs (debug)
> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 test4 4.3.0-dgc+
> MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/ram1
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o dax /dev/ram1 /mnt/scratch
> ....
> generic/083 2s ... 1s
> _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/ram1 is inconsistent (c) (see /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/generic/083.full)
> _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/ram1 is inconsistent (r) (see /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/generic/083.full)
> ....
>
> But as I ran earlier today when testing the ENOSPC fix:
>
> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 test4 4.4.0-rc2-dgc+
> MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/ram1
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o dax /dev/ram1 /mnt/scratch
> ....
> generic/083 1s ... 2s
> ....
>
> So I'm seeing that the current 4.4-rc2 + my local dev tree patches
> appear to have fixed whatever was causing generic/083 to fail
> here...
Yea, interesting, the patch you sent out yesterday:
xfs: Don't use reserved blocks for data blocks with DAX
Makes this issue disappear in my system as well. Testing with v4.4-rc3
generic/083 fails 50% of the time or so in my setup, but with just that patch
added to v4.4-rc3 I can't make it fail.
> What version of xfsprogs are you using, Ross?
I'm currently using xfsprogs v4.3.0, but the failure occurred when I was using
v4.2.0 as well.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-03 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-01 22:43 xfstest failure with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 Ross Zwisler
2015-12-01 23:51 ` Dave Chinner
2015-12-02 15:12 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-12-03 6:51 ` Dave Chinner
2015-12-03 16:43 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151203164342.GA14849@linux.intel.com \
--to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox