From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753909AbbLEUDX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 5 Dec 2015 15:03:23 -0500
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:57576 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750798AbbLEUDW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 5 Dec 2015 15:03:22 -0500
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 21:03:13 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
        Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/cpufeature: Remove unused and seldomly used
 cpu_has_xx macros
Message-ID: <20151205200313.GB18105@pd.tnic>
References: <1448982023-19187-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>
 <1448982023-19187-4-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>
 <alpine.DEB.2.11.1512052058300.3595@nanos>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1512052058300.3595@nanos>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 08:59:45PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > -#define cpu_has_ht		boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HT)
> 
> tip/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h: In function ‘cpu_has_ht_siblings’:
> tip/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h:28:17: error: ‘cpu_has_ht’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>   has_siblings = cpu_has_ht && smp_num_siblings > 1;

Yeah, this series needs to go ontop of

ed29210cd6a6 ("x86: Remove unused function cpu_has_ht_siblings()")

which is in tip/x86/cleanups.

BTW, thanks for taking a look, I'll send an updated one removing the
static_cpu_has_safe() calls as you suggested in your other mail.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.