From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: Migrate 'alloc_cpumask_var()' users to 'zalloc_cpumask_var()'
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 05:09:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208040903.GA31689@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFydR-Tzp4KAQsZ5-19E8dFO_QoOmAZ3FzGF=Vo+8mJCNg@mail.gmail.com>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Xunlei Pang reported a scheduler bug in init_rootdomain(), which is
> > caused by improper use of alloc_cpumask_var(), which results in
> > uninitialized cpumasks being allocated.
> >
> > No-one noticed this scheduler bug for a long time, probably because
> > alloc_cpumask_var() does result in initialized cpumasks in the
> > !CPUMASK_OFFSTACK case - which is the vast majority of systems
> > out there.
> >
> > So migrate all alloc_cpumask_var() users over to zalloc_cpumask_var(), to be
> > on the safe side.
>
> Ugh. I'd rather just see us say that "allocating a cpumask always returns a
> zeroed mask".
>
> There really is no reason to ever not zero it (they aren't _that_ big even on
> huge machines), so I'd rather just get rid of the "zalloc" version that is the
> less common one anyway.
Sure - that was my original suggestion, will reshape the series to do it like
that.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-07 8:49 [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] cpumask: Robustify the var-cpumask allocation APIs Ingo Molnar
2015-12-07 8:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: Migrate 'alloc_cpumask_var()' users to 'zalloc_cpumask_var()' Ingo Molnar
2015-12-08 1:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-08 4:09 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-12-08 4:13 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <CA+55aFyOXsv6uY3Dyc=i3SmwFD8XQYZeqzPXz36qzvdOD=gZSg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-12-16 0:26 ` Rusty Russell
2015-12-07 8:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpumask: Remove 'alloc_cpumask_var()' Ingo Molnar
2015-12-07 8:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpumask: Rename 'alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var()' to 'zalloc_bootmem_cpumask_var()' Ingo Molnar
2015-12-07 8:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpumask: Rename 'alloc_cpumask_var_node()' to '__alloc_cpumask_var_node()' Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151208040903.GA31689@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).