From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932950AbbLHEdR (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2015 23:33:17 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:35539 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932518AbbLHEdN (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2015 23:33:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:03:00 +0530 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] spi: lm70llp: remove multiple blank lines Message-ID: <20151208043259.GA23610@sudip-pc> References: <1449485255-1103-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20151207200737.GN5727@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151207200737.GN5727@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:07:37PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:17:28PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > checkpatch complains about multiple blank lines. > > Please don't resubmit already applied patches, please submit against the > latest development code for the subsystem you're submitting to (unless > the change is a bug fix that should go to Linus). I think there is some confusion. I am not seeing v1 of these patches in for-next branch of your spi tree. And in review of v1 you said to use dev_*. And for that last 2 patch of v1 changed and one extra came so I sent the whole series as v2. regards sudip