From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752782AbbLIUMd (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:12:33 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:51881 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751667AbbLIUMb (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:12:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:12:27 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: vinod.koul@intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH for 4.4 0/2] DT/dmaengine: edma: Convert 16bit arrays to 32bit Message-ID: <20151209201226.GB23396@atomide.com> References: <1449649091-9848-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1449649091-9848-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Ujfalusi [151209 00:19]: > Hi, > > Based on the discussion regarding to (convert am33xx to use the new eDMA > bindings): > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg122117.html > > This two patch will convert the new eDMA binding to not use 16bit arrays for > memcpy channel selection and for marking slots reserved. > The '/bits/ 16' seams to be causing confusion so it is probably better to just > use standard type for the arrays. > > The new bindings for the eDMA is introduced for 4.4 and we do not have users of > it, which means that we can still change it w/o the risk of breaking anything > and we do not need to maintain the compatibility with 16bit arrays. > > The changes in the eDMA driver is local to the DT parsing and should not > conflict with other changes (like the filter function mapping support). Hrm, > there might be trivial conflict in the include/linux/platform_data/edma.h with > the "dmaengine 'universal' API". > > Tony, Arnd, Vinod: Can you agree on the practicalities on how these patches are > going to be handled? I would like to send the updated am33xx/am437x conversion > for 4.5 based on these changes. Yes this should go into v4.4 as discussed, otherwise it will be a mess. For both, please feel free to add: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren I suggest Vinod sets up an immutable branch against v4.4-rc1 with just these two patches. Then it can get merged into whichever branch needs it, I certainly will need it as most of my v4.5 branches are v4.4-rc1 or -rc2 based. Then the immutable branch can be merged into v4.4 by Vinod or Arnd. Regards, Tony