From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752542AbbLJCky (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 21:40:54 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:52821 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751538AbbLJCkx (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 21:40:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:40:50 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , Neil Brown Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2] ->follow_link() without dropping from RCU mode Message-ID: <20151210024049.GC20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20151117225752.GZ22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20151209053209.GV20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20151209182309.GZ20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20151210001012.GA20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151210001012.GA20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:10:12AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > PS: I toyed with the idea of replacing cookie a struct callback_head, to make ... except that it would have to be something like work_struct, since callback_head gets embedded into the argument and here we don't want to do that. _And_ we've no use for ->entry in work_struct, which makes it a bad fit as well. IOW, please ignore that idiocy...