From: Jeff Merkey <linux.mdb@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, uobergfe@redhat.com,
dzickus@redhat.com, atomlin@redhat.com, cmetcalf@ezchip.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] Fix spurious hard lockup events while in debugger
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:30:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215033045.GA14158@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
The current touch_nmi_watchdog() function in /kernel/watchdog.c does
not always catch all cases when a processor is spinning in the nmi
handler inside either KGDB, KDB, or MDB, in particular, the case where
a processor is being held by a debugger inside an int1 handler.
The hrtimer_interrupts_saved count can still end up matching the
hrtime value in some cases, resulting in the hard lockup detector
tagging processors inside a debugger and executing a panic.
The patch below corrects this problem. I did not add this to
the touch_nmi_function directly becuase of possible affects on
timing issues since the function is widely used by drivers and
modules.
I have tested this patch and it fixes the problem for kernel debuggers
stopping errant hard lockup events when processors are spinning inside
the debugger.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Merkey <linux.mdb@gmail.com>
---
kernel/watchdog.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 18f34cf..b682aab 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -283,6 +283,13 @@ static bool is_hardlockup(void)
__this_cpu_write(hrtimer_interrupts_saved, hrint);
return false;
}
+
+void touch_hardlockup_watchdog(void)
+{
+ __this_cpu_write(hrtimer_interrupts_saved, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(touch_hardlockup_watchdog);
+
#endif
static int is_softlockup(unsigned long touch_ts)
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-15 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 3:30 Jeff Merkey [this message]
2015-12-16 16:57 ` [PATCH] Fix spurious hard lockup events while in debugger Jeff Merkey
2015-12-16 17:22 ` Jeff Merkey
2015-12-16 17:50 ` Don Zickus
2015-12-16 17:55 ` Jeff Merkey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151215033045.GA14158@localhost.localdomain \
--to=linux.mdb@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=uobergfe@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox