From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] [media] media-device: check before unregister if mdev was registered
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:41:53 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215084153.1f54d561@recife.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <566B5DFB.3020100@osg.samsung.com>
Em Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:36:27 -0700
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> escreveu:
> On 12/11/2015 03:57 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > Most media functions that unregister, check if the corresponding register
> > function succeed before. So these functions can safely be called even if a
> > registration was never made or the component as already been unregistered.
> >
> > Add the same check to media_device_unregister() function for consistency.
> >
> > This will also allow to split the media_device_register() function in an
> > initialization and registration functions without the need to change the
> > generic cleanup functions and error code paths for all the media drivers.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> > Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v5: None
> > Changes in v4: None
> > Changes in v3: None
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Reword the documentation for media_device_unregister(). Suggested by Sakari.
> > - Added Sakari's Acked-by tag for patch #1.
> >
> > drivers/media/media-device.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/media-device.c b/drivers/media/media-device.c
> > index c12481c753a0..11c1c7383361 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/media-device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/media-device.c
> > @@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__media_device_register);
> > * media_device_unregister - unregister a media device
> > * @mdev: The media device
> > *
> > + * It is safe to call this function on an unregistered
> > + * (but initialised) media device.
> > */
> > void media_device_unregister(struct media_device *mdev)
> > {
> > @@ -584,6 +586,10 @@ void media_device_unregister(struct media_device *mdev)
> > struct media_entity *next;
> > struct media_interface *intf, *tmp_intf;
> >
> > + /* Check if mdev was ever registered at all */
> > + if (!media_devnode_is_registered(&mdev->devnode))
> > + return;
>
> This is a good check, however, this check will not prevent
> media_device_unregister() from getting run twice by two
> different drivers. i.e media_devnode gets unregistered
> towards the end of at the end of media_device_unregister().
>
> In an example case, if bridge driver and snd-usb-aduio both
> call media_device_unregister(), this check won't help prevent
> media_device_unregister() being done only once. I think we
> need a different state variable in struct media_device
> to ensure unregister is done only once.
True. We need move the spin_lock() code to be called before
calling media_device_is_registered().
I'm sending such patches.
Thanks for reporting it.
Regards,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-15 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-11 22:57 [PATCH v5 0/3] [media] Fix race between graph enumeration and entities registration Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-12-11 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] [media] media-device: check before unregister if mdev was registered Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-12-11 23:36 ` Shuah Khan
2015-12-15 10:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2015-12-21 12:14 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-12-11 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] [media] media-device: split media initialization and registration Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-12-11 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] [media] media-device: set topology version 0 at media registration Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-12-12 13:50 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] [media] Fix race between graph enumeration and entities registration Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-12-21 11:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151215084153.1f54d561@recife.lan \
--to=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox