From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964973AbbLOKgn (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:36:43 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:44967 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964803AbbLOKgl (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:36:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 07:36:37 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , David Ahern , Steven Rostedt , Frederic Weisbecker , Andi Kleen , Wang Nan Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] perf tools: Try to show pretty printed output for dynamic sort keys Message-ID: <20151215103637.GZ6843@kernel.org> References: <1450107973-2447-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1450107973-2447-7-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <20151215090329.GE16565@krava.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151215090329.GE16565@krava.brq.redhat.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:03:29AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:46:13AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Each tracepoint event has format string for print to improve > > readability. Try to parse the output and match the field name. If it > > finds one, use that for the result. If not, fallbacks to the original > > output. > > > > For example, sort on kmem:kmalloc.gfp_flags looks like below: > > (Note: libtraceevent plugins are not installed on my system. They might > > affect the output below) > > > > Before: > > # Overhead Command gfp_flags > > # ........ ....... .......... > > # > > 99.89% perf 32848 > > 0.06% sleep 208 > > 0.03% perf 32976 > > 0.01% perf 208 > > > > After: > > # Overhead Command gfp_flags > > # ........ ....... ................... > > # > > 99.89% perf GFP_NOFS|GFP_ZERO > > 0.06% sleep GFP_KERNEL > > 0.03% perf GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO > > 0.01% perf GFP_KERNEL > > hum, maybe we want some way to switch back to numbers? Or remove repetitive stuff like GFP_? I guess this was done already for perf kmem? - Arnaldo