From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/pistachio: Fix wrong calculated clocksource read value
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:33:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151216093340.GD8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56712D33.5080009@linaro.org>
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 12/16/2015 08:36 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >And in fact, clocksource_mmio_readw_down() also has similar issue, but it masks
> >with c->mask before return, the c->mask is less than 32 bit (because the
> >clocksource_mmio_init think number of valid bits > 32 or < 16 is invalid.)
> >the higher 32 bits are masked off, so we never saw such issue. But we'd better
> >to fix that, what's your opinion?
>
> I think we should have a look to this portion closely.
There is no need to return more bits than are specified. If you have
a N-bit counter, then the high (64-N)-bits can be any value, because:
static inline cycle_t clocksource_delta(cycle_t now, cycle_t last, cycle_t mask)
{
return (now - last) & mask;
}
where 'now' is the current value returned from the clock source read
function, 'last' is a previously returned value, and 'mask' is the
bit mask. This has the effect of ignoring the high order bits.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 15:42 [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/pistachio: Fix wrong calculated clocksource read value Jisheng Zhang
2015-12-15 20:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-12-16 7:11 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-12-16 7:28 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-12-16 7:36 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-12-16 7:49 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-12-16 9:21 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-12-16 9:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-12-16 10:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-12-16 10:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-16 16:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-12-17 9:07 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-12-16 9:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-12-16 9:02 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151216093340.GD8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).