From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755485AbbLQJst (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:48:49 -0500
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:60249 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750846AbbLQJsr (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:48:47 -0500
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:48:42 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrew.pinski@caviumnetworks.com,
        dbueso@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/osq: fix ordering of node initialisation in
 osq_lock
Message-ID: <20151217094655.GA11456@arm.com>
References: <1449856001-21177-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
 <56720D78.9080706@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56720D78.9080706@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 05:18:48PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> What is the status of this patch?  It there a good likelihood that it will
> make it into v4.4?
> 
> If not, we should request that c55a6ffa6285 ("locking/osq: Relax atomic
> semantics") be reverted for v4.4

I think Peter was going to send it to mingo as an urgent fix, but I've
not seen anything from the tip-bot yet.

Will