From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751616AbbLQR2J (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:28:09 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59523 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751400AbbLQR2G (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:28:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:28:05 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Rik van Riel Cc: Ani Sinha , Paul McKenney , Randy Dunlap , Richard Weinberger , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ivan Delalande , fruggeri , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: new warning on sysrq kernel crash trigger Message-ID: <20151217172805.GA32096@kroah.com> References: <566B49E3.1080107@redhat.com> <20151211222742.GJ4054@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20151212010344.GR4054@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <566EF73C.3090505@redhat.com> <56719071.3070905@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56719071.3070905@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:25:21AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 12/15/2015 07:52 PM, Ani Sinha wrote: > > Rik, should I send a separate email with the patch or you are OK > > with what I sent in the email? Are you queueing up my patch for > > applying upstream? > > I don't have a git tree for people to pull from, and > it looks like the tty & sysrq maintainers are Greg KH > and Jiri Slaby. > > Greg, Jiri, where do you prefer Ani sends the patch > for inclusion, or should it go in through Paul's tree? I don't care which, either is fine for me.