From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933347AbbLQVfk (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:35:40 -0500 Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([148.251.95.138]:50104 "EHLO cvs.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932429AbbLQVfi (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:35:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 22:34:00 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle DL5RB To: David Miller Cc: gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, dvyukov@google.com, ajk@comnets.uni-bremen.de, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jslaby@suse.com, syzkaller@googlegroups.com, kcc@google.com, glider@google.com, sasha.levin@oracle.com, edumazet@google.com Subject: Re: use-after-free in sixpack_close Message-ID: <20151217213400.GA15130@linux-mips.org> References: <20151217114104.6946d72b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20151217.160532.999129498473749695.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151217.160532.999129498473749695.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:05:32PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > This should fix it, the only thing I'm unsure of is if we should perhaps > also use del_timer_sync() here. Anyone? I think so. Ralf