From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754584AbbLVTjz (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:39:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:33917 "EHLO mail-pf0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754357AbbLVTjv (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:39:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:31:52 -0800 From: Olof Johansson To: Afzal Mohammed Cc: Nishanth Menon , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Kevin Hilman , Tony Lindgren , lkml , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , ARM Linux , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable beaglebone PMIC TPS65217 Message-ID: <20151222193152.GW30172@localhost> References: <1450118580-24754-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <1450118580-24754-2-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <20151215135100.GA8288@afzalpc> <20151216134541.GA5574@afzalpc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151216134541.GA5574@afzalpc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 07:15:41PM +0530, Afzal Mohammed wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:49:07AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:42:58PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > > >> Enable PMIC for beaglebone similar to commit 7a5c6065669c ("ARM: > > >> OMAP2+: omap2plus_defconfig: Add tps65217 support") - this allows > > >> multi_v7_defconfig to boot up on older beaglebone platforms. > > > > > > A similar one - > > > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-November/384289.html > > > > > > your v1 was earlier than the above, so mine should > /dev/null. > > > > If you'd like to, please reply back on original patch dropping your > > patch.. or if queued, I can drop mine (I dont see it on linux-next > > yet). > > That patch didn't get a reply at all, hence assuming that it won't be > picked & don't want to create a noise on that silent thread ;), but if > it gets applied, i will fight against my patch :) As mentioned in the earlier reply, don't assume a patch that hasn't been applied yet won't be -- please follow up with a redaction of it if that's what you want. Since I go through my mail folder in chronological order, I come across your patch first and will apply it when I get to it. Anyway, not a big deal since the contents is the same. -Olof