From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751988AbcABROg (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2016 12:14:36 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:52892 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751812AbcABROe (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2016 12:14:34 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:14:31 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= Cc: Ivaylo Dimitrov , Pavel Machel , Sebastian Reichel , Nishanth Menon , Aaro Koskinen , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Nokia N900: twl4030-power different data in DTS and board code Message-ID: <20160102171430.GC12622@atomide.com> References: <201601021513.32814@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201601021513.32814@pali> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Pali Rohár [160102 06:14]: > Hello, > > now I'm looking at differences between legacy board code and DTS file > for Nokia N900 and I see some inconsistency for twl4030-power driver. > > In board code are defined more twl4030 power scripts which override > defaults defined in twl4030-power code. See: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c#n790 > > Next in DTS file is defined just "compatible" keyword, but no custom > scripts, see: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts#n416 > > And the last in DTS file is defined line: > > compatible = "ti,twl4030-power-n900" > > which is not in twl4030-power driver itself, see: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c#n851 > > So all this stuff looks like some errors when board code was ported to > DTS. Tony, can you look at this at all? AFAIK it should work fine with the generic "ti,twl4030-power-idle-osc-off". This means reboot works and regulators are cut off during off mode. The n900 specific code was based on something before the TI generic values were available I think. And the last time I looked at it I came to the conclusion the n900 specific code is no better. Or did I miss something? Are you seeing some issues with PM with dts based code? We can certainly add it to twl4030-power if it provides something that the "ti,twl4030-power-idle-osc-off" does not. Regards, Tony