From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] udf: avoid uninitialized variable use
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:56:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160104095605.GC3888@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5491623.oZlI0zcRmi@wuerfel>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2441 bytes --]
On Fri 01-01-16 15:21:54, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A new warning about a real bug has come up from a recent cleanup:
>
> fs/udf/inode.c: In function 'udf_setup_indirect_aext':
> fs/udf/inode.c:1927:28: warning: 'adsize' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>
> If the alloc_type is neither ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_SHORT nor ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_LONG,
> the value of adsize is undefined. This changes the code to use zero for adsize
> in that case, which may be the correct solution, though I have not looked
> at the code in enough detail to know if it should be something else instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: fcea62babc81 ("udf: Factor out code for creating indirect extent")
> ---
> sorry for missing another instance the first time around. The warning is
> a bit unreliable and it seems in my first configuration I got it only
> for one of the two instances that show it in other configuration.
>
> After checking the remaining functions in this file for the same possible
> problem, I found that the other functions use either 'BUG()' or 'return -EIO'
> in the 'else' path, so I assume the two functions here should one of those
> as well, but I don't know which.
Callers of these functions make sure alloc_type is one of the two valid
ones. However for future-proofing you're right that probably we should
handle the invalid case as well. Setting adsize to zero is problematic -
not sure what the code would actually do but it wouldn't definitely work.
I'd just return -EIO. Attached is the patch I have merged.
Honza
>
> diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
> index 5b83351041a4..42f68dd7e6ef 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
> @@ -1890,6 +1890,8 @@ int udf_setup_indirect_aext(struct inode *inode, int block,
> adsize = sizeof(struct short_ad);
> else if (UDF_I(inode)->i_alloc_type == ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_LONG)
> adsize = sizeof(struct long_ad);
> + else
> + adsize = 0;
>
> neloc.logicalBlockNum = block;
> neloc.partitionReferenceNum = epos->block.partitionReferenceNum;
> @@ -1963,6 +1965,8 @@ int __udf_add_aext(struct inode *inode, struct extent_position *epos,
> adsize = sizeof(struct short_ad);
> else if (iinfo->i_alloc_type == ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_LONG)
> adsize = sizeof(struct long_ad);
> + else
> + adsize = 0;
>
> if (!epos->bh) {
> WARN_ON(iinfo->i_lenAlloc !=
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-udf-avoid-uninitialized-variable-use.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1746 bytes --]
>From 4f1b1519f7bec44ded3c2c4d46a2594c01446dc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 15:21:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] udf: avoid uninitialized variable use
A new warning has come up from a recent cleanup:
fs/udf/inode.c: In function 'udf_setup_indirect_aext':
fs/udf/inode.c:1927:28: warning: 'adsize' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
If the alloc_type is neither ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_SHORT nor
ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_LONG, the value of adsize is undefined. Currently,
callers of these functions make sure alloc_type is one of the two valid
ones but for future proofing make sure we handle the case of invalid
alloc type as well. This changes the code to return -EIOin that case.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: fcea62babc81 ("udf: Factor out code for creating indirect extent")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/udf/inode.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
index 846294891925..91d8fa9d87a4 100644
--- a/fs/udf/inode.c
+++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
@@ -1889,6 +1889,8 @@ int udf_setup_indirect_aext(struct inode *inode, int block,
adsize = sizeof(struct short_ad);
else if (UDF_I(inode)->i_alloc_type == ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_LONG)
adsize = sizeof(struct long_ad);
+ else
+ return -EIO;
neloc.logicalBlockNum = block;
neloc.partitionReferenceNum = epos->block.partitionReferenceNum;
@@ -1962,6 +1964,8 @@ int __udf_add_aext(struct inode *inode, struct extent_position *epos,
adsize = sizeof(struct short_ad);
else if (iinfo->i_alloc_type == ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_LONG)
adsize = sizeof(struct long_ad);
+ else
+ return -EIO;
if (!epos->bh) {
WARN_ON(iinfo->i_lenAlloc !=
--
2.6.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-04 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-01 12:47 [PATCH] udf: avoid uninitialized variable use Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 14:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-04 9:56 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2016-01-04 10:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160104095605.GC3888@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox