From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753468AbcADL0x (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 06:26:53 -0500 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:37854 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752444AbcADL0v (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 06:26:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:26:48 +0100 From: Maxime Ripard To: arnd@arndb.de, Andre Przywara Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , marc.zyngier@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] arm64: Introduce Allwinner SoC config option Message-ID: <20160104112648.GD11722@lukather> References: <1450787267-26836-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <1450787267-26836-6-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hoZxPH4CaxYzWscb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1450787267-26836-6-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --hoZxPH4CaxYzWscb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andre, Arnd, On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:27:47PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: > To prepare for supporting the Allwinner A64 SoC, introduce a config > option to allow compiling Allwinner (aka. sunxi) specific drivers > for ARM64. > This patch just defines the ARCH_SUNXI symbol to allow Allwinner > specific drivers to be selected during kernel configuration. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara I'm ok taking this patch. I'm not quite sure how the process works though with arm64. Should I send a PR with this patch to Catalin, or does it go through the usual arm-soc maintainers? We should also probably extend the MAINTAINERS entry, shouldn't we? Thanks, Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --hoZxPH4CaxYzWscb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWilb4AAoJEBx+YmzsjxAgXP4P/iHvhXNNSuuFq+Bn7LbC+pUO bAi0UZkNpRcIkObZzgUGQ6x0WOHleqlS0us23yPfsS/IDndRcYD7c22l3WfTH23D wW6KVhvEvLWKbhQpUaZzxXWh9Y9U42t8bFYLsNgogXS6N/G7FrAIDvGLxk7WMHll 9+OSJ/F+94Uh6JpIni6WFG4yVjXr8viuPFNISm3TwMTlVP9CcrIevMc5KluWQgPO HwsIDngQP5J7Lg62eXRCn5+I8J4CnsQGc37tuvA0A8Hif0eZHKY+V7LDmIOzQRy6 RL6aqZadqTjRmwQAsWpfEJo363mKUOzE1kuvRuZ2s/6pw1Xo1DExNk2szePIGCP6 ABbVuwgLrGwgF13DaC9XmrJB9oZbe3262I+m/7RwjfYByr2WVRlEDjaRARPqt+rM Lh2rsM1b4xLGhr71EdU3Ixxu+VkyWrFqDWiNiDaUo0njHh5CSSs+OL26BCgdXNrD azc+EgCPsFM76ZecTpt8ToM2zlIiGWMxpRi4PL+n0QyPX+0HyYBhLcTAjXq7R9gl szKJehClLFkKx6ro5zYWZYC0R4Uz6xExfWwfL4ajtG1zPcUrTZwPdmJURyK7wCUb nd3sN3lhzp5KF3YgcRQywvUtmX/Xw4uhTzydFjkTILl/xFHFYUx3/dZbOezvNB9l eFLN0IQZCbmAKebZ+Rz9 =iQCh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hoZxPH4CaxYzWscb--