From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
To: changbin.du@intel.com
Cc: balbi@ti.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mina86@mina86.com,
r.baldyga@samsung.com, rui.silva@linaro.org,
k.opasiak@samsung.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: f_fs: avoid race condition with ffs_epfile_io_complete
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:32:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160105033216.GA29244@shlinux2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451371018-14918-1-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com>
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:36:58PM +0800, changbin.du@intel.com wrote:
> From: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
>
> ffs_epfile_io and ffs_epfile_io_complete runs in different context, but
> there is no synchronization between them.
>
> consider the following scenario:
> 1) ffs_epfile_io interrupted by sigal while
> wait_for_completion_interruptible
> 2) then ffs_epfile_io set ret to -EINTR
> 3) just before or during usb_ep_dequeue, the request completed
> 4) ffs_epfile_io return with -EINTR
>
> In this case, ffs_epfile_io tell caller no transfer success but actually
> it may has been done. This break the caller's pipe.
>
> Below script can help test it (adbd is the process which lies on f_fs).
> while true
> do
> pkill -19 adbd #SIGSTOP
> pkill -18 adbd #SIGCONT
> sleep 0.1
> done
>
> To avoid this, just dequeue the request first. After usb_ep_dequeue, the
> request must be done or canceled.
>
> With this change, we can ensure no race condition in f_fs driver. But
> actually I found some of the udc driver has analogical issue in its
> dequeue implementation. For example,
> 1) the dequeue function hold the controller's lock.
> 2) before driver request controller to stop transfer, a request
> completed.
> 3) the controller trigger a interrupt, but its irq handler need wait
> dequeue function to release the lock.
> 4) dequeue function give back the request with negative status, and
> release lock.
> 5) irq handler get lock but the request has already been given back.
>
get unlock?
During the interrupt handler, it should only handle the "data complete"
interrupt on queued request; if the "data complete" interrupt occurs, but
it belongs to nobody, it will handle noop.
> So, the dequeue implementation should take care of this case. IMO, it
> can be done as below steps to dequeue a already started request,
> 1) request controller to stop transfer on the given ep. HW know the
> actual transfer status.
> 2) after hw stop transfer, driver scan if there are any completed one.
> 3) if found, process it with real status. if no, the request can
> canceled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Du, Changbin <changbin.du@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> index cf43e9e..8050939 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> @@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ static ssize_t ffs_epfile_io(struct file *file, struct ffs_io_data *io_data)
> struct ffs_ep *ep;
> char *data = NULL;
> ssize_t ret, data_len = -EINVAL;
> + bool interrupted = false;
> int halt;
>
> /* Are we still active? */
> @@ -829,26 +830,35 @@ static ssize_t ffs_epfile_io(struct file *file, struct ffs_io_data *io_data)
>
> spin_unlock_irq(&epfile->ffs->eps_lock);
>
> - if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> - /* nop */
> - } else if (unlikely(
> + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> + goto error_mutex;
> +
> + if (unlikely(
> wait_for_completion_interruptible(&done))) {
> - ret = -EINTR;
> - usb_ep_dequeue(ep->ep, req);
> - } else {
> /*
> - * XXX We may end up silently droping data
> - * here. Since data_len (i.e. req->length) may
> - * be bigger than len (after being rounded up
> - * to maxpacketsize), we may end up with more
> - * data then user space has space for.
> + * To avoid race condition with
> + * ffs_epfile_io_complete, dequeue the request
> + * first then check status. usb_ep_dequeue API
> + * should guarantee no race condition with
> + * req->complete callback.
> */
> - ret = ep->status;
> - if (io_data->read && ret > 0) {
> - ret = copy_to_iter(data, ret, &io_data->data);
> - if (!ret)
> - ret = -EFAULT;
> - }
> + usb_ep_dequeue(ep->ep, req);
> + interrupted = true;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * XXX We may end up silently droping data
> + * here. Since data_len (i.e. req->length) may
> + * be bigger than len (after being rounded up
> + * to maxpacketsize), we may end up with more
> + * data then user space has space for.
> + */
> + ret = ep->status < 0 && interrupted ?
> + -EINTR : ep->status;
> + if (io_data->read && ret > 0) {
> + ret = copy_to_iter(data, ret, &io_data->data);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> }
> kfree(data);
> }
> @@ -859,6 +869,7 @@ static ssize_t ffs_epfile_io(struct file *file, struct ffs_io_data *io_data)
>
> error_lock:
> spin_unlock_irq(&epfile->ffs->eps_lock);
> +error_mutex:
> mutex_unlock(&epfile->mutex);
> error:
> kfree(data);
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-29 6:36 [PATCH] usb: f_fs: avoid race condition with ffs_epfile_io_complete changbin.du
2016-01-04 20:33 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2016-01-05 3:32 ` Peter Chen [this message]
2016-01-05 4:09 ` Du, Changbin
2016-01-05 5:49 ` Peter Chen
2016-01-05 6:22 ` Du, Changbin
2016-01-05 12:45 ` Michal Nazarewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160105033216.GA29244@shlinux2 \
--to=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=changbin.du@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=k.opasiak@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=r.baldyga@samsung.com \
--cc=rui.silva@linaro.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).