From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752747AbcAEP7G (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:59:06 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:39573 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752055AbcAEP7A (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:59:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:58:58 +0100 From: Torsten Duwe To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Denis Kirjanov , Steven Rostedt , Jiri Kosina , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] ppc64le FTRACE_WITH_REGS implementation Message-ID: <20160105155857.GA2699@lst.de> References: <20151125172608.9588569260@newverein.lst.de> <20151125172902.82C6C69260@newverein.lst.de> <20151201172914.GB5509@lst.de> <1449008285.12022.0.camel@ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1449008285.12022.0.camel@ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:18:05AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > I (still) haven't had a chance to have a good look at it, but I won't this week > anyway. So post v5 and hopefully I can review that and it will be perfect :) The perfect v5 is there now, for 4 weeks minus the holiday season, and no further problems arose. Independently verified by Petr Mladek -- don't forget his high-level fix. Torsten