From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752451AbcAEQCJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:02:09 -0500 Received: from mail5.windriver.com ([192.103.53.11]:53042 "EHLO mail5.wrs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751892AbcAEQCF (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:02:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:59:32 -0500 From: Paul Gortmaker To: Masahiro Yamada CC: Olof Johansson , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/bus: make uniphier-system-bus.c explicitly non-modular Message-ID: <20160105155932.GT12458@windriver.com> References: <1451935379-14107-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Re: [PATCH] drivers/bus: make uniphier-system-bus.c explicitly non-modular] On 05/01/2016 (Tue 11:31) Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2016-01-05 11:26 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > > Hi Paul, > > [...] > > > > > > I assume commit 326ea45aa827 ("bus: uniphier: allow only built-in driver") > > is a temporary fix. > > > > I'd like to revive the tristate for this driver > > by hook or by crook. > > > > > > I've sent the following to fix the build error. > > http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ > > Sorry, I mean this one: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7952361/ Sure, I'll shelf it and assume it will get back to tristate. Note however that the patch I was looking at was not 326ea. It was commit 6c741c74092c61465af206672ba567940a23d709 Author: Daniel Kurtz Date: Tue Dec 22 21:46:37 2015 +0800 pinctrl: mediatek: convert to arch_initcall ..and if you make it tristate again, you defeat the above change, since if you look at module.h, you will see for the =m config: #define arch_initcall(fn) module_init(fn) ...meaning that the change in 6c741c does nothing if =m is set. I don't know if that is an issue or not, perhaps Daniel can comment. Paul. -- > > > > -- > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada