public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] X.509: Don't check the signature on apparently self-signed keys [ver #2]
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:00:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160105170052.GB28071@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2752.1452012031@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

On 16-01-05 16:40:31, David Howells wrote:
> Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > You're missing Petko's patch:
> > 41c89b6 IMA: create machine owner and blacklist keyrings
> 
> It should also be cc'd to the keyrings mailing list.

Right.

If i am not terribly mistaken there's no way to revoke a certificate that is in 
a CA hierarchy with the system keyring on top of it.  Certain scenarios require 
us to revoke them as it was presented at the last year's LSS.

If x509_key_preparse() is not the right place then where shall i place the 
check?


		Petko

      reply	other threads:[~2016-01-05 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-05 15:47 [RFC PATCH] X.509: Don't check the signature on apparently self-signed keys [ver #2] David Howells
2016-01-05 15:55 ` David Howells
2016-01-05 16:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-05 16:39   ` David Howells
2016-01-06 12:22     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-06 13:21       ` David Howells
2016-01-06 14:03         ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-06 14:19           ` David Howells
2016-01-06 17:00         ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-05 16:40   ` David Howells
2016-01-05 17:00     ` Petko Manolov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160105170052.GB28071@localhost \
    --to=petkan@mip-labs.com \
    --cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox