From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752493AbcAFXMO (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:12:14 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f193.google.com ([209.85.220.193]:34569 "EHLO mail-qk0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752110AbcAFXMM (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:12:12 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 894 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 18:12:11 EST Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 17:57:14 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: Parav Pandit Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, Johannes Weiner , Doug Ledford , Liran Liss , "Hefty, Sean" , Jason Gunthorpe , Haggai Eran , Jonathan Corbet , james.l.morris@oracle.com, serge@hallyn.com, Or Gerlitz , Matan Barak , raindel@mellanox.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 6/6] rdmacg: Added documentation for rdma controller. Message-ID: <20160106225714.GI3660@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1452020286-9508-1-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <1452020286-9508-7-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <20160105215309.GG5995@mtj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:14:26AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > Yes. I read through. I can see two changes to be made in V2 version of > this patch. > 1. rdma.resource.verb.usage and rdma.resource.verb.limit to change > respectively to, > 2. rdma.resource.verb.stat and rdma.resource.verb.max. > 3. rdma.resource.verb.failcnt indicate failure events, which I think > should go to events. What's up with the ".resource" part? Also can't the .max file list the available resources? Why does it need a separtae list file? > I roll out new patch for events post this patch as additional feature > and remove this feature in V2. > > rdma.resource.verb.list file is unique to rdma cgroup, so I believe > this is fine. Please see above. > We will conclude whether to have rdma.resource.hw. or not in > other patches. > I am in opinion to keep "resource" and "verb" or "hw" tags around to > keep it verbose enough to know what are we trying to control. What does that achieve? I feel that it's getting overengineered constantly. Thanks. -- tejun