From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753152AbcAGPIA (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:08:00 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com ([209.85.220.177]:34392 "EHLO mail-qk0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751534AbcAGPH6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:07:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:07:56 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: Parav Pandit Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, Johannes Weiner , Doug Ledford , Liran Liss , "Hefty, Sean" , Jason Gunthorpe , Haggai Eran , Jonathan Corbet , james.l.morris@oracle.com, serge@hallyn.com, Or Gerlitz , Matan Barak , raindel@mellanox.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 2/6] IB/core: Added members to support rdma cgroup Message-ID: <20160107150756.GD29797@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1452020286-9508-1-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <1452020286-9508-3-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <20160105215656.GI5995@mtj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:46:19AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:28:02AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > >> Added function pointer table to store resource pool specific > >> operation for each resource type (verb and hw). > >> Added list node to link device to rdma cgroup so that it can > >> participate in resource accounting and limit configuration. > > > > Is there any point in splitting patches 1 and 2 from 3? > > > Patch 2 is in IB stack, so I separated that patch out from 1. That > makes it 3 patches. > If you think single patch is easier to review, let me know, I can > respin to have one patch for these 3 smaller patches. They don't do anything by themselves. I think putting them into a single patch would be easier to review. Thanks. -- tejun