From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752672AbcAGST2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:19:28 -0500 Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([148.251.95.138]:41914 "EHLO cvs.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751220AbcAGST1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:19:27 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:19:20 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH] ld-version: fix it on Fedora Message-ID: <20160107181920.GE17031@linux-mips.org> References: <1452189189-31188-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1452189189-31188-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 07:55:24PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fedora 23, ld --version outputs: > GNU ld version 2.25-15.fc23 > > But ld-version.sh fails to parse this, so e.g. mips build fails to > enable VDSO, printing a warning that binutils >= 2.24 is required. > > To fix, teach ld-version to parse this format. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > > Which tree should this be merged through? Mine? MIPS? MIPS is the sole user of ld-ifversion at this time and taking this through the MIPS tree will avoid possible merge conflicts with James Hogan's pending d5ece1cb074b2c7082c9a2948ac598dd0ad40657 fix ("Fix ld-version.sh to handle large 3rd version part"). So I think I should take this through the MIPS tree. Thanks! Ralf